A Predictive Supervised Learning Architecture for Automated Vehicle–Railway Bridge Collision Detection, Monitoring, and Safety Optimization

Authors

  • Dr. Miguel Santos Department of Artificial Intelligence and Information Systems Philippine Institute of Digital Technology Manila, Philippines Author

Keywords:

Supervised Machine Learning, Railway Bridge Safety, Collision Detection, Structural Health Monitoring

Abstract

Vehicle–railway bridge collisions represent a persistent safety challenge that can compromise transportation infrastructure, interrupt railway operations, and generate substantial economic losses. Conventional bridge inspection and monitoring practices often rely on periodic inspections or isolated sensing mechanisms, limiting their ability to provide timely collision detection and predictive decision support. Recent developments in structural health monitoring, wireless sensing, intelligent video surveillance, and supervised machine learning have created opportunities for designing integrated monitoring systems capable of identifying collision events while simultaneously assessing infrastructure conditions and supporting proactive maintenance strategies. This paper proposes a Predictive Supervised Learning Architecture for Automated Vehicle–Railway Bridge Collision Detection, Monitoring, and Safety Optimization, which integrates heterogeneous sensing technologies, structural health monitoring, supervised classification algorithms, and predictive risk analysis into a unified decision-support framework. The proposed architecture combines visual monitoring, vibration sensing, synchronized wireless sensor networks, and intelligent data processing to distinguish collision events from normal operational conditions while estimating structural damage severity and recommending appropriate response actions. The framework further incorporates continuous learning mechanisms to improve prediction accuracy using historical infrastructure data and validated collision records. A comprehensive review of existing structural monitoring techniques demonstrates that although significant advances have been achieved in vibration-based damage detection, wireless monitoring, and bridge instrumentation, limited research has focused on integrating supervised learning with real-time railway bridge collision management.
    
    
    

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Avci, O., Abdeljaber, O., Kiranyaz, S., Hussein, M., Gabbouj, M., & Inman, D. J. (2021). A review of vibration-based damage detection in civil structures: From traditional methods to machine learning and deep learning applications. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 147, 107077.

2. Basharat, A., Catbas, N., & Shah, M. (2005). A framework for intelligent sensor network with video camera for structural health monitoring of bridges. In Third IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, 385–389.

3. Devi, G. N., & Vijayalakshmi, M. M. (2021). Smart structural health monitoring in civil engineering: A survey. Materials Today: Proceedings, 45(7), 7143–7146.

4. Fu, Y., Mechitov, K., Hoang, T., Kim, J. R., Memon, S. A., & Spencer, B. F. (2021). Efficient and high-precision time synchronization for wireless monitoring of civil infrastructure subjected to sudden events. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 28(1), e2643.

5. He, Z., Li, W., Salehi, H., Zhang, H., Zhou, H., & Jiao, P. (2022). Integrated structural health monitoring in bridge engineering. Automation in Construction, 136, 104168.

6. SNCF Réseau. (2021). Heurt sur un pont: Contextualisation, caractérisation et mesure des conséquences par l’enstrumentation. AUDACE 2021.

7. Vagnoli, M., Remenyte-Prescott, R., & Andrews, J. (2018). Railway bridge structural health monitoring and fault detection: State-of-the-art methods and future challenges. Structural Health Monitoring, 17(4), 971–1007.

8. Zhang, J., & Feng, C. (2018). Routledge handbook of transport in Asia. UK: Taylor & Francis Group.

9. Ramamurthy, K., Gumber, S., Abdelfattah, W.M. et al. Human AI trust modeling in cognitive systems via ensemble learning and advanced feature engineering. Discov Artif Intell 6, 366 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-026-01255-7

10. Philip, P. G. (2026). Artificial Intelligence–Driven Intelligent Project Management: an integrated framework for planning, scheduling and control in engineering and construction projects. Journal of Engineering and Artificial Intelligence, 02(02), 01–09. https://doi.org/10.64142/jeai.2.2.50

11. Chowdhury, W. A. (2025). Blockchain for Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Reducing Waste Through Transparent Resource Tracking. Journal of Procurement and Supply Chain Management, 4(2), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.58425/jpscm.v4i2.435

12. S. R. Lankala, M. R. Marri, A. Jain, G. G. Battu, U. Lakhina and S. Singla, "Optimal Financial Fraud Detection and Alerting Mechanism in Cloud Computing Using Deep Belief Network," 2025 International Conference on Emerging Trends in Networks and Computer Communications (ETNCC), Windhoek, Namibia, 2025, pp. 743-748, doi: 10.1109/ETNCC66224.2025.11299665.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-08

How to Cite

Dr. Miguel Santos. (2026). A Predictive Supervised Learning Architecture for Automated Vehicle–Railway Bridge Collision Detection, Monitoring, and Safety Optimization. Sciencebring Scientific and Management Studies, 6(08), 20-35. https://sciencebring.net/index.php/sqrd/article/view/208

Similar Articles

11-20 of 147

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.