Enhancing SSD Reliability Through Explainable AI-Based Failure Prediction Models

Authors

  • Dilshod M. Usmanov Department of Computer Science, Samarkand University of Information Technology, Samarkand, Uzbekistan Author

Keywords:

Solid-State Drive, SSD Reliability, Failure Prediction, Explainable AI

Abstract

Solid-state drives (SSDs) have become fundamental storage components in modern computing infrastructures because of their high throughput, low access latency, and suitability for data-intensive workloads. However, SSD reliability remains a significant concern because degradation and failure can emerge from complex interactions among workload characteristics, device states, and accumulated wear. Conventional predictive models may provide useful failure probabilities while offering limited insight into why a drive is classified as high risk. This limitation reduces their practical value in reliability management, where storage administrators require interpretable evidence before initiating preventive maintenance or replacement. This paper proposes an explainable artificial intelligence framework for SSD failure prediction that integrates machine-learning-based classification with local and global explanation mechanisms, particularly LIME and SHAP. The methodological design also considers architectural principles derived from deep residual, densely connected, convolutional, and neural architecture search models. These approaches provide theoretical foundations for constructing robust feature-processing and model-selection components while avoiding unnecessary architectural complexity. The proposed framework emphasizes predictive accuracy, interpretability, feature attribution, and operational usefulness as complementary objectives. The analysis indicates that an effective SSD reliability system should not treat explainability as a post-processing feature alone but incorporate interpretability into the complete prediction pipeline. The study further identifies a trade-off between increasingly sophisticated predictive architectures and the transparency required for operational deployment. The resulting framework provides a research-oriented foundation for developing trustworthy SSD failure prediction systems in which predictions can be accompanied by understandable evidence for decision-making.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, “Deep residual learning for image recognition,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), Jun. 2016, pp. 770–778.

2. G. Huang, Z. Liu, L. Van Der Maaten, and K. Q. Weinberger, “Densely connected convolutional networks,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., Jul. 2017, pp. 4700–4708.

3. A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton, “Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks,” in Proc. NeurIPS, 2012, pp. 1–9.

4. H. Liu, K. Simonyan, and Y. Yang, “DARTS: Differentiable architecture search,” 2018, arXiv:1806.09055.

5. Z. Lu, R. Cheng, S. Huang, H. Zhang, C. Qiu, and F. Yang, “Surrogate-assisted multiobjective neural architecture search for real-time semantic segmentation,” IEEE Trans. Artif. Intell., vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 1602–1615, Jun. 2022.

6. H. Sheng, H.-L. Liu, Y. Lai, S. Zeng, and L. Chen, “Hierarchical encoding method for retinal segmentation evolutionary architecture search,” IEEE Trans. Emerg. Topics Comput. Intell., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 480–493, Feb. 2025.

7. K. Simonyan and A. Zisserman, “Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition,” 2014, arXiv:1409.1556.

8. Y. Xue, “Evolutionary architecture search for generative adversarial networks based on weight sharing,” IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 653–667, Jun. 2024.

9. Y. Xue, C. Yao, M. Wahib, and M. Gabbouj, “YOLO-DKR: Differentiable architecture search based on kernel reusing for object detection,” Inf. Sci., vol. 713, Sep. 2025, Art. no. 122180.

10. L. W. Yao, H. Xu, W. Zhang, X. D. Liang, and Z. G. Li, “SM-NAS: Structural-to-modular neural architecture search for object detection,” in Proc. AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell., vol. 34, no. 7, 2020, pp. 12661–12668.

11. Kumar, S. K. (2026). Explainable AI for SSD Failure Prediction: Using LIME and SHAP for Transparency. Journal of Engineering Research and Sciences, 5(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.55708/js0504001

Downloads

Published

2026-09-07

How to Cite

Dilshod M. Usmanov. (2026). Enhancing SSD Reliability Through Explainable AI-Based Failure Prediction Models . Sciencebring Scientific and Management Studies, 6(09), 20-29. https://sciencebring.net/index.php/sqrd/article/view/226

Similar Articles

31-40 of 132

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.